Peer-review process

The journal "Innovation in Stomatology" considers peer review an integral part of scholarly dialogue that contributes to the clarification of interpretations, deepening of textual analysis, and improvement of research quality. Expert evaluation is intended not only to select manuscripts for publication but also to support the development of philological thought through professional interaction between authors and reviewers.

The editorial board ensures independence, impartiality, and confidentiality of the peer-review process, as well as equal conditions for all authors regardless of their academic school, institutional affiliation, or country.

All submitted manuscripts undergo preliminary editorial screening for compliance with the journal’s scope and basic academic requirements.

The journal uses a double-blind peer review system, which ensures anonymity of both authors and reviewers, thereby guaranteeing objectivity in evaluation.

Selection of reviewers is based on their specialization, experience in working with relevant texts, theoretical approaches, and publication activity. If necessary, independent experts, including international researchers, may be involved.

Evaluation criteria include:
– scientific novelty and relevance of the topic;
– depth and validity of textual or linguistic analysis;
– methodological clarity and appropriateness of the chosen approach;
– logical coherence and structural integrity;
– correctness of sources and citations;
– contribution to philological scholarship.

Review timeline is typically 3–4 weeks from the reviewer’s agreement, but may vary depending on the complexity of the manuscript or the need for additional expertise.

Review format involves a written report with reasoned comments and a recommendation regarding the manuscript’s fate (acceptance, revision, resubmission, or rejection).

Decision-making is carried out by the editorial board based on the received reviews. In case of divergent opinions, additional review may be requested. The author is provided with consolidated feedback and the opportunity to revise the manuscript.

The editorial board guarantees confidentiality of the peer-review process and adherence to ethical standards in communication between all participants in scholarly publishing.